Given planning drawings alone, each builder invents the missing sixty per cent and prices their own version. A construction drawing package removes the invention: same build-ups, same steel, same schedules, so the quotes you compare are actually comparable.
Construction drawings are the set a builder prices and builds from: 1:50 plans, sections and elevations, 1:5 to 1:20 details, a structural layout and the schedules. Planning drawings answer whether you may build; construction drawings answer how. Given only the former, every builder prices a different building.
| Planning drawings | Construction drawings | |
|---|---|---|
| Question answered | May I build this? | How is it built? |
| Typical scale | 1:100 and 1:200 | 1:50 down to 1:5 |
| Shows material build-ups | No | Yes, every one |
| Shows setting-out dimensions | Overall only | Opening by opening |
| Read by | Case officer, neighbours | Builder, engineer, trades |
| Submitted to | Planning department | Building control |
Source: MHCLG District Planning Application Statistics (PS1 and PS2), decisions made in the twelve quarters 2023 Q2 to 2026 Q1, retrieved 1 September 2026. Open Government Licence v3.0.
A construction drawing package is the document a builder prices from and builds from. If something is not in it, someone on site decides it instead, and you pay for that decision twice: once when it is made and again when it turns out to conflict with something else.
| Drawing | Scale | What it settles |
|---|---|---|
| General arrangement plans | 1:50 | Room sizes, wall positions, door and window openings, setting-out dimensions |
| Sections | 1:50 | Floor-to-ceiling heights, floor build-ups, roof pitch, head heights under beams |
| Elevations | 1:50 or 1:100 | Materials, opening positions, rainwater goods, levels against the existing |
| Construction details | 1:5 to 1:20 | Every junction: insulation continuity, damp-proofing, ventilation, fire stopping |
| Structural layout | 1:50 | Beam and lintel positions keyed to the engineer's calculations |
| Schedules | — | Windows, doors, lintels, floor and wall build-ups, sanitaryware |
The schedules are the part homeowners are most often missing and the part builders most want. A window schedule that says which of eleven openings is fire-egress, which is obscure-glazed and which is restricted to 100 mm opening removes eleven separate phone calls.
They answer different questions and are read by different people. A planning officer is deciding whether the proposal is acceptable in its context. A bricklayer is deciding where to put a brick. Those need different documents, and a drawing that tries to be both is usually bad at each.
| Planning drawings | Construction drawings | |
|---|---|---|
| Question answered | May I build this? | How is it built? |
| Read by | Case officer, neighbours, committee | Builder, engineer, building control, trades |
| Typical scale | 1:100 and 1:200 | 1:50 down to 1:5 |
| Shows build-ups | No | Yes, every one |
| Shows dimensions | Overall only | Setting-out, opening by opening |
| Submitted to | The council's planning department | Building control, and the builder |
Both stages are covered in our Complete package, and the planning drawings are produced first because the construction set is drawn against whatever permission was actually granted, including any conditions attached to it.
Usually because they are not pricing the same job. Given planning drawings only, each builder has to invent the missing 60 per cent, and they invent it according to their own risk appetite. One assumes a 150 mm insulated slab, another assumes 100 mm. One prices a steel goalpost, another prices a padstone and a lintel. The spread you are looking at is not competition, it is uncertainty.
There is a measurable version of this in the planning data. Across London, 7.4% of applications in the twelve quarters to March 2026 were withdrawn before any decision was made — that is the applicant pulling out, not the council refusing. Withdrawal is what an underspecified scheme looks like from the outside.
Source: MHCLG District Planning Application Statistics (PS1 and PS2), decisions made in the twelve quarters 2023 Q2 to 2026 Q1, retrieved 1 September 2026. Open Government Licence v3.0.
A fixed fee, quoted before we start, that does not move because a junction took three attempts.
| Package | Fixed fee | Turnaround |
|---|---|---|
| Essentials — survey, existing and proposed plans | from £840 | 14–20 working days |
| Loft conversion package | from £1,225 | 14–20 working days |
| Mansard / roof rebuild package | from £1,575 | 18–24 working days |
| Complete — planning plus construction information | from £1,750 | 20–28 working days |
Add to that the statutory application fee, which is set nationally and paid to the council rather than to us: £548 for a householder planning application and £274 for a Lawful Development Certificate.
For a house extension or a loft conversion you may usually choose either route, and the choice decides how much gets settled on paper before anyone starts. A full plans application is assessed against the regulations before work begins; a building notice has no plan check at all, so every detail is judged on site by the inspector who happens to visit. The second route is not cheaper. It moves the same decisions to the most expensive moment to make them.
Two features of the current regime are worth knowing before you choose. The relevant authority must tell you the outcome of a full plans application within five weeks, or a longer period agreed with you in writing. And if it says nothing at all, silence is neither an approval nor a refusal — the application simply remains undetermined. That is the opposite of the planning system, where non-determination gives you a right of appeal. Waiting out a building control authority gains you nothing.
The choice is also not always yours. A building notice cannot be used where the work is subject to the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, where a building fronts onto a private street, where paragraph H4 of Schedule 1 applies, or for certain electrical work in England — a new circuit, a replacement consumer unit, or an addition to an existing circuit in a special location such as a bathroom. A flat conversion or a mixed-use building will often fall into the first of those.
| Full plans | Building notice | |
|---|---|---|
| Checked before you build | Yes, against the regulations | No plan check at all |
| Decision period | Five weeks, or longer if agreed in writing | Two clear days’ notice, then start |
| If the authority says nothing | Undetermined — not an approval | Not applicable |
| Available for a flat or mixed use | Yes | Usually no |
| Who carries the design risk | Settled on paper, before pricing | The inspector on the day, and you |
| Drawings needed | The full construction set | None required — which is the problem |
Source: Building Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/2214) regulations 12 and 14A, as amended by the Building Regulations etc. (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2023 (SI 2023/911), in force 1 October 2023. Retrieved 2 September 2026. Open Government Licence v3.0.
Not the same things your case officer looked at. Planning judged how the building sits in the street; building control judges whether it stands up, keeps heat in, gets people out in a fire, and does not poison anyone slowly. Those are answered by build-ups and dimensions, not by elevations. A set that satisfied a planning officer will usually not satisfy a plans checker, which is why the second set exists.
In practice a checker reads four things closely. The structural drawings and the engineer’s calculations, together, since a beam size means nothing without the load case behind it. The thermal build-ups for every new element, wall, roof and floor, each with its calculated U-value. The fire strategy — escape route, door ratings, alarm grade — which for a loft conversion is usually the item that fails first. And the drainage layout, including where a new soil connection meets the existing run and at what fall.
Each of those is a drawing or a schedule, and each is one an average builder will otherwise decide on site. That is the honest argument for a construction set: not that it satisfies a regulation, but that it moves four decisions from the week they are most expensive to the week they are cheapest.
Whenever load moves. Removing a wall, cutting a new opening, taking the roof off a storey, or putting a dormer where a rafter used to run — each of those changes the path a load takes to the ground, and a checker will want the calculation, not an opinion. We draw the arrangement and specify the member; the engineer sizes it and signs the numbers. The two documents are read together, and neither passes alone.
What does not need an engineer is a like-for-like refit, a non-structural partition, or a window replaced in an existing opening at the same width. If your builder says a beam is “obviously fine”, that is exactly the sentence a plans checker will ask him to put in writing, and he will not.
The set a builder actually builds from: dimensioned plans, sections and elevations at 1:50, construction details at 1:5 to 1:20, a structural layout keyed to the engineer's calculations, and the schedules that say which window, which lintel and which floor build-up goes where. They are sometimes called working drawings or a technical package.
Planning drawings answer whether you may build it. Construction drawings answer how it gets built. Planning is judged on appearance, scale and impact on neighbours, so the drawings show form and position. Construction drawings add every build-up, dimension, junction and specification the trades need.
You need them to get a price you can hold someone to. Without them each builder prices a different building, because each one fills the gaps differently, and the cheapest quote is usually the one that assumed the least. A common set means the quotes are comparable.
They overlap heavily but are not identical. Building regulations drawings are the subset submitted to building control to demonstrate compliance. A full construction set includes those plus the buildability information building control does not need to see, such as setting-out dimensions and finishes schedules.
Our Complete package is issued in 20 to 28 working days from the measured survey, and that covers both the planning set and the building regulations set. A loft conversion package is 14 to 20 working days.
Our Complete package is a fixed £1,750 and includes the construction information. We quote a fee, not an hourly rate, so revisions during the process do not change the number you were given.


Site plans are included in every drawing package we produce, on a licensed Ordnance Survey base with the ownership edging done properly.
Get a quote
Before you commit, it is worth understanding what it costs and seeing why homeowners choose us. You can search the site to find the right fit, or contact us to talk it through. When you are ready, get a quote today — most homeowners have a fee in minutes — or contact us about your project and an architectural technologist will be in touch.

Each area page carries the local planning authority, conservation-area position, postcode districts and typical housing stock for that address.