Approved at first submission by Hillingdon Council in 14 weeks.
Generously on the 6m route. It handled 476 larger-extension notifications in the three years to March 2026 and told 354 of them that no prior approval was required, granting 77 and refusing 45. It approved 84.2% of the householder applications it decided.
| Measure | Hillingdon | London |
|---|---|---|
| Larger-extension notifications | 476 | 354 not required, 77 granted, 45 refused |
| Householder approval rate | 84.2% | 83.0% |
| Extension applications in the Datahub | 11,496 | 74% approved |
| Lawful development certificates issued | 1,756 | — |
| Appeals allowed after refusal | 45.4% of 1,126 | 39.0% of 15,646 |
| Median householder appeal | 57 days | fastest in London |
Sources: decision figures from MHCLG District Planning Application Statistics (PS1 and PS2), twelve quarters to March 2026; the Datahub row from the Planning London Datahub, retrieved 15 August 2026, phrase-matched and comparable within Hillingdon only; appeals from Planning Inspectorate casework decided 2016–2026.
The briefA Hillingdon family came to us for a two-storey rear extension on a 1930s semi-detached house, which is the borough’s commonest housing by a wide margin. Three things shaped the scheme: the rhythm of the street, keeping usable garden depth behind the new build line, and meeting what the council expects in a borough carrying 29 conservation areas.
Week one was the measured survey. Three design rounds followed, each one trading internal layout against how much of the new mass the neighbours would actually see. Two massings were tested against Hillingdon Council’s adopted design guidance before one was chosen: the existing roof pitch carried across, brick matched to what was there, and the new opening pulled back from the eaves.
Submitted to Hillingdon Council through the Planning Portal, with permitted development eligibility confirmed by a parallel certificate application. Officer comments were minor and answered inside 5 days, and no extension of time was ever asked for — which is worth noting in a borough that agreed one on 2,331 of the 5,698 applications it decided over the three years the current MHCLG return covers, 40.9% against 34.5% for London as a whole (MHCLG PS1/PS2, retrieved 1 September 2026). Approved at first submission.
Decision recorded Hillingdon Council, statutory determination period.

Pick a slot that suits you. No obligation and no sales pressure, just straight answers on your planning route.

Each Hillingdon postcode district we work in, what the housing there mostly is, and who validates a house extensions scheme in it. Figures in the fee column are the statutory England charges for 2026 that go to the council. Ours are separate, and agreed before a drawing is started.
| Postcode | Area | Dominant stock | What it means for a house extensions |
|---|---|---|---|
| UB10 | Hillingdon / Ickenham | 1930s semi-detached | A house extensions at an UB10 address in Hillingdon / Ickenham is determined by Hillingdon Council under its own Local Plan policies for Hillingdon / Ickenham. |
| UB8 | Uxbridge | Georgian fragments, 1930s semi-detached, post-war flats | Uxbridge is where the council itself sits, so an extension application from a UB8 address is validated a short walk from the house it concerns. |
| HA4 | Ruislip | 1930s semi-detached, Tudor cottages | Ruislip, in HA4, is one of the parts of the borough carrying a village conservation area, and the same officers decide extensions inside and outside that boundary. |
| HA6 | Northwood | 1930s detached, Edwardian villas | Northwood is the northern tip of the borough, on HA6, and its extension applications are read against exactly the Local Plan that applies everywhere else in Hillingdon. |
| UB3 | Hayes | 1930s semi-detached, post-war estates | Hayes sits in the south of the borough near Heathrow, and much of the housing there is post-war, which normally means generous plot depth behind a rear addition. |
| UB7 | West Drayton | 1930s semi-detached, post-war | West Drayton lies at the western edge of Hillingdon and shares the UB7 district with Yiewsley. Extension work from either goes to the same council planning team. |
| UB10 | Ickenham | 1930s semi-detached, Tudor fragments | Ickenham shares UB10 with Hillingdon village. Both send extension applications to one set of case officers, and both are judged against the same adopted design guidance. |
| UB9 | Harefield | Tudor and Georgian fragments, 1930s semi-detached | Harefield is the far north of the borough, largely ringed by Metropolitan Green Belt, and it is that designation rather than the council team that usually limits an extension there. |
| UB7 | Yiewsley | 1930s semi-detached | Yiewsley adjoins West Drayton and the two are handled as one area for casework, with proposals determined by Hillingdon under identical policies. |
| HA5 | Eastcote | 1930s semi-detached | Eastcote shares HA5 with Pinner, which is in Harrow, so an Eastcote address is confirmed against the borough boundary before the extension application is lodged. |
Pitch, wall build-up and plot depth shift across a handful of Hillingdon streets, and every shift moves what an extension can achieve at a given address. Close to a third of the borough’s 118,250 dwellings went up in the 1930s — 29.8% of them, on the VOA stock table for 31 March 2025 — which is why so many of these projects begin with the same house and finish somewhere different.
Conservation areas covering Hillingdon: 29 of them, and Uxbridge, Ruislip Village and Northwood are the three owners here run into most. Once an address falls inside one the fallback disappears: instead of a £249 prior approval settled in six weeks, the scheme becomes a full householder application at £548 with eight weeks to run, and an agreed extension on top of that is common in this borough. In Northwood the street elevation gets read first and the floor plan second. Conservation area status is checked before we quote.
Hillingdon permitted development status: there is no borough-wide direction from Hillingdon Council, so a house extensions at a UB10 address is normally still permitted development. We certify that with a £274 Lawful Development Certificate rather than leaving a Hillingdon sale to argue it later.
Hillingdon housing stock: 1930s semi-detached dominates; Metropolitan Green Belt covers much of north Hillingdon; Victorian cottages in Uxbridge and Ruislip villages; post-war housing near Heathrow. Largest outer west London borough; significant Green Belt; Heathrow noise contours affect planning decisions in Harmondsworth and Sipson. Read that before choosing a house extensions route in Hillingdon — construction, not postcode, sets what is achievable.
Sources for this Hillingdon house extensions page: borough policies maps and conservation-area registers (2025–26), Royal Mail postcode district boundaries, the Town and Country Planning (Fees for Applications) (England) Regulations, the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 as amended, and the Party Wall etc. Act 1996.
Same MCIAT team. Same approval discipline.
Start your quoteOr contact us about your project first