What a Harrow house can gain without a planning application, from a single-storey rear extension to a loft or a side infill, and the circumstances in which that stops being true.
Harrow has no borough-wide Article 4 direction, so householder permitted development rights are intact across most of the borough. On the 1930s semis that dominate Harrow you can build a 3m single-storey rear extension outright, or 6m through prior approval. Green Belt land at Stanmore and Harrow Weald is the exception.
| Where, and what | Rear extension, outright | Via prior approval |
|---|---|---|
| 1930s semi — most of the borough | 3m | 6m |
| Detached, Pinner and Stanmore | 4m | 8m |
| Edwardian villa, Harrow on the Hill | 3m | 6m |
| Any of the above in a conservation area | none — full planning | not available |
| Green Belt, Harrow Weald and Stanmore | restricted | not available |
| Flat or maisonette | none — full planning | not available |
Depths from Class A, Schedule 2 Part 1, GPDO 2015 as amended; prior approval is determined in six weeks after a 21-day neighbour consultation and costs £249. Harrow’s Green Belt at Harrow Weald and Stanmore is a separate policy constraint that sits on top of permitted development, not inside it — the drawings still have to argue openness. Article 4 status verified against Harrow Council’s published directions.
Single-storey rear extension up to 3m deep (attached house) or 4m (detached); side extension up to half the original width; loft conversion up to 40m³ (terraced) or 50m³ (semi-detached); single-storey outbuilding within the curtilage; replacement windows and doors. All subject to material match, eaves setback (20cm), and not facing a highway.
No. Class C3 dwellinghouses hold these rights; nothing else does. Maisonettes and flats therefore need consent for almost anything visible from outside. That distinction shows up in Harrow's own numbers: 634 refusals out of 2,856 householder decisions, 22.2%, against 393 out of 1,005 minor schemes, 39.1%. Flat conversions and small residential schemes sit in the second group, and are turned down at close to twice the rate. Source: MHCLG live planning statistics.
Yes, and sharply. Article 1(5) land strips out the parts of Classes A and B that people most want: no side extension, no two-storey rear extension, no cladding, and no enlargement of the roof at all, so a dormer inside a Harrow conservation area is a planning application from the first sketch. Taking down a chimney stack needs consent too.
A certificate is the council's written ruling that what you propose is already lawful, which settles the argument before a builder starts and again when a buyer's solicitor asks. The fee for a lawful development certificate is £274, on top of the drawings that show what is being certified. Harrow recorded 1,147 of them over twelve quarters to March 2026. Source: MHCLG live planning statistics.
Yes. Losing the planning requirement does not touch the building regulations, which run on a separate track covering structure, insulation, fire safety, drainage and ventilation. Building control still has to sign the work off. We draw the two together, consent drawings alongside building regs drawings, so they agree with one another rather than being reconciled on site.



Pick a slot that suits you. No obligation and no sales pressure, just straight answers on your planning route.
District by district: what Harrow's housing stock looks like in each one, which authority validates a scheme there, and the statutory England fees as they stand in 2026. The householder application fee in England is £548. That is what the council charges to determine the application. It is neither a builder's estimate nor our design fee.
| Postcode | Area | Dominant stock | What it means for a permitted development scheme |
|---|---|---|---|
| HA1 | Harrow / Harrow on the Hill | Georgian and Victorian houses, listed buildings | Harrow / Harrow on the Hill sits wholly inside HA1, so Harrow Council validates every permitted development scheme submitted from an HA1 address. |
| HA2 | North Harrow / South Harrow | 1930s semi-detached | North Harrow and South Harrow both sit in HA2, and HA2 sits inside the borough with no overlap, so every permitted development scheme from an HA2 address is validated by Harrow. |
| HA3 | Harrow Weald / Kenton / Wealdstone | 1930s semi-detached | HA3 covers Harrow Weald / Kenton / Wealdstone only; Harrow Council handles the permitted development scheme. |
| HA7 | Stanmore | 1930s semi-detached, Edwardian villas | Stanmore falls wholly inside HA7 and wholly inside Harrow. Nothing about the boundary needs resolving before a scheme goes in. |
| HA5 | Pinner / Eastcote | Tudor fragments, Edwardian villas, 1930s semi-detached | HA5 straddles a boundary: Pinner is Harrow, Eastcote is Hillingdon. Both policies maps get checked against the address first, because the answer decides which council receives the scheme. |
Roof pitch, wall build-up and back garden depth shift from street to street across Harrow, and each of the three changes what a permitted development scheme can actually reach at a given address.
How designation changes a Harrow permitted development scheme: Harrow Council maintains 29 conservation areas, including Stanmore, Harrow Weald, Harrow on the Hill. Inside any of them a Harrow permitted development scheme cannot rely on permitted development, and the route becomes a £548 householder application determined in 8 weeks rather than a £249 prior approval in 6 weeks. Stanmore sets the tone for Harrow casework.
Article 4 and your Harrow permitted development scheme: Harrow Council has made no borough-wide direction, so permitted development for a permitted development scheme in Harrow generally survives outside Harrow conservation areas and listed curtilages. A Lawful Development Certificate at £274 is how a HA1 owner records that a permitted development scheme was lawful.
The building fabric around Harrow: 1930s semi-detached dominates; Edwardian villas in Harrow on the Hill and Pinner; Metropolitan Green Belt in Stanmore and Harrow Weald; post-war flats around Harrow Central. Outer north-west London suburban; Harrow on the Hill has exceptionally strict heritage controls; rest of borough permissive. A permitted development scheme in Harrow is scoped against that stock first.
Sources for this Harrow permitted development scheme page: borough policies maps and conservation-area registers (2025–26), Royal Mail postcode district boundaries, the Town and Country Planning (Fees for Applications) (England) Regulations, the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 as amended, and the Party Wall etc. Act 1996.

Same-day fixed quote. MCIAT chartered. 98% first-time approval rate.
Start free quoteOr contact us about your project first