Bexley turns householder decisions round quickly, and the London comparator shows by how much: 2,364 of the 2,415 householder decisions in its last three years of MHCLG returns landed inside eight weeks, 97.9%, where the 33 boroughs pooled manage 92.5%. Only 21 ran past 13 weeks. None of which matters when you need no decision at all — so what follows is the loft, side and single-storey rear extension work that goes ahead here without full planning, and the exceptions that stop it.
It needs the notification, not usually a decision. Bexley told 213 households no prior approval was required, granted 27 and refused 42 — a 39.1% grant rate against 34.6% across London. The certificate route is busier still: 882 lawful development certificates in three years.
| Larger home extension route | Bexley | London |
|---|---|---|
| Prior approval not required | 213 | 9,067 |
| Granted | 27 | 1,930 |
| Refused | 42 | 3,646 |
| Grant rate | 39.1% | 34.6% |
| Lawful development certificates | 882 | 36,657 |
| Householder approval | 91.7% | 83.0% |
The numbers above are taken from MHCLG's district-level planning application statistics for April 2023 to March 2026, returns PS1 and PS2. Read a zero in that return carefully: it records that the borough did not upload the measure, not that no such decisions happened. Published under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
In detailSingle-storey rear extension up to 3m deep (attached house) or 4m (detached); side extension up to half the original width; loft conversion up to 40m³ (terraced) or 50m³ (semi-detached); single-storey outbuilding within the curtilage; replacement windows and doors. All subject to material match, eaves setback (20cm), and not facing a highway.
No. Permitted development attaches to houses — Class C3 dwellings — and not to flats or maisonettes. On those, almost any external alteration means a full planning application.
Yes, and substantially. Inside a conservation area a side extension is no longer permitted development, and nor is a two-storey one at the rear. Cladding drops out of the allowance, taking down a chimney needs permission, and what you may do to the roof is cut right back.
A Lawful Development Certificate is written confirmation from the council that your proposal really does fall inside permitted development. Worth having before you build, and worth more again when you sell. Budget around £103 in council fees, plus the drawings it has to be based on.
Yes. The two regimes have nothing to do with each other. Permitted development takes away the planning application and leaves everything else standing — building control still wants to see structure, insulation, fire safety, drainage and ventilation before it signs anything off. We produce the planning drawings and the building regs drawings both.



Pick a slot that suits you. No obligation and no sales pressure, just straight answers on your planning route.
A district-by-district read of Bexley: the streets we work on, the age and type of house on them, and the authority that validates a permitted development scheme there. Fee figures reproduce England's statutory 2026 scale, not what preparing a scheme costs.
| Postcode | Area | Dominant stock | What it means for a permitted development scheme |
|---|---|---|---|
| DA15 | Sidcup | 1930s semi-detached, Edwardian villas | Sidcup sits wholly inside DA15, so Bexley Council validates every permitted development scheme submitted from an DA15 address. |
| DA16 | Welling | 1930s semi-detached | Welling sits in DA16, wholly within Bexley, and the council determines schemes there under the policies that apply across Welling. |
| DA17 | Belvedere | 1930s semi-detached, post-war flats | Belvedere occupies DA17 and answers to Bexley Council, which assesses schemes there against the Local Plan policies covering the area. |
| DA18 | Erith Marshes | 1930s semi-detached dominates; Victorian cottages in Bexley Village and Crayford; post-war estates in Thamesmead and Erith | DA18 is Erith Marshes and nothing else. Bexley handles the scheme, and its officers apply the DA18 conservation-area mapping to it. |
| SE2 | Abbey Wood | 1930s semi-detached dominates; Victorian cottages in Bexley Village and Crayford; post-war estates in Thamesmead and Erith | Abbey Wood is cut in two by the SE2 boundary. Greenwich or Bexley may determine a scheme there, so both policies maps get consulted before anything is lodged. |
| DA1 | Crayford / Dartford fringe | Victorian terraces, 1930s semi-detached | Bexley's permitted development checks cover the Crayford end of DA1 and go no further. The rest of the district, Dartford town among it, is in Kent under Dartford Borough Council, which maintains its own article 4 register — and since an article 4 direction is what removes permitted development rights, the authority holding that register is the one that determines whether your rights survive. Work out the council from the address before assuming a scheme is permitted. |
| DA5 | Old Bexley | Georgian villas, Victorian cottages | DA5 covers Old Bexley alone. The council handles the scheme, with case officers working from the DA5 conservation-area mapping. |
| DA6 | Bexleyheath | 1930s semi-detached | Bexleyheath is DA6 throughout. Bexley Council determines applications from there, working to the Local Plan policies covering the town. |
Two streets over in Bexley the roof pitch is different, the wall build-up is different and the plot has a different depth. Each of those changes what permitted development can achieve at an address.
Conservation areas covering Bexley: 16 are designated, and the three that come up most in our work here are Bexley Village, Old Bexley and Crayford. Designation cancels permitted development. The same scheme then has to be lodged as a householder application, £548 and an eight-week determination, where an undesignated address would have used prior approval at £249 in six. In Bexley Village, the street elevation is the drawing that gets read first. Outside the designations the picture is friendlier still: the council determined 282 larger-householder prior approvals over those three years and concluded in 213 cases, three-quarters of them, that prior approval was not required, against 61.9% for London as a whole.
Article 4 and your Bexley permitted development scheme: Bexley Council has made no borough-wide direction, so permitted development for a permitted development scheme in Bexley generally survives outside Bexley conservation areas and listed curtilages. A Lawful Development Certificate at £274 is how a DA1 owner records that a permitted development scheme was lawful.
The building fabric around Bexley: 1930s semi-detached dominates; Victorian cottages in Bexley Village and Crayford; post-war estates in Thamesmead and Erith. Outer south-east London suburban; very permissive planning environment; strong PD uptake for extensions and loft conversions. A permitted development scheme in Bexley is scoped against that stock first.
Sources for this Bexley permitted development scheme page: borough policies maps and conservation-area registers (2025–26), Royal Mail postcode district boundaries, the Town and Country Planning (Fees for Applications) (England) Regulations, the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 as amended, and the Party Wall etc. Act 1996.

Same-day fixed quote. MCIAT chartered. 98% first-time approval rate.
Start free quoteOr contact us about your project first