Beyond its 15 conservation areas, Havering is an unusually forgiving borough for a large rear extension: of 674 prior-approval applications, 519 were found to need no approval at all and just 91 were refused, a refusal share of 13.5% where London runs at 24.9%. Step inside one of the 15 and that route closes. Here is what changes, and what a Heritage Statement then has to carry.
Very little: 11 designations covering about 380 hectares in one of London’s largest boroughs. Yet 13.1% of Havering’s householder appeals involve a listed building — one of the highest shares in the capital, which is not obvious from its outer-suburban reputation.
| Measure | Havering | London |
|---|---|---|
| Conservation areas | 11 | 1,141 |
| Area covered | 380 hectares | — |
| Householder appeals involving a listed building | 13.1% | — |
| Householder approval rate | 81.8% | 83.0% |
| Decided inside eight weeks | 97.9% | — |
| Lawful development certificates issued | 1,637 | — |
| Householder appeals allowed after refusal | 42.1% of 489 | 40.8% of 13,067 |
Sources: conservation areas from the planning.data.gov.uk register, retrieved 1 September 2026, with hectares computed from the published boundaries; decision figures from MHCLG PS1 and PS2, twelve quarters to March 2026; appeal figures and composition from Planning Inspectorate casework decided 2016–2026.
Two layers are offered on this map and, in Havering, only one of them has anything to draw. The conservation areas are here as the national register records them, sitting over the borough outline, and a postcode entered in the box is tested against them inside the page itself. The usual limit applies: these outlines approximate legal boundaries. They are reliable for telling you which area you are in or near, and no substitute for the council’s definitive line where a property touches one.
Take the empty layer first, because it is the one that misleads. Havering has not uploaded any Article 4 direction to the national register, so there is nothing for the map to plot. That is a gap in publication rather than a finding about the borough — sixteen London councils have filed nothing at all to that dataset, and not one of them is thereby without directions. If a scheme of yours depends on a permitted development right surviving, ask Havering, and do not read anything into blank space. What the map does show is a compact, outer-London pattern. Designated land here comes to 380.2 hectares, and Cranham is much the largest piece of it at 155.3 hectares, a village core and its surroundings out on the Essex edge of London. The smallest is RAF Hornchurch at 0.9 hectares, where what is being protected is the surviving fabric of a wartime airfield rather than a street of houses — a reminder that the same three words cover very different things from one boundary to the next. No designation date is held for any Havering area, so the map is silent on when any of it was drawn. Every area does have a council document filed with it, which is the text to read before a design is settled.
What is drawn and measured here comes from the planning.data.gov.uk registers of conservation areas and of article-4 direction areas, retrieved on 15 August 2026 and looked at again a fortnight later, on 1 September 2026. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0
In detailFifteen areas carry designation across Havering. Romford Market, Upminster, Hornchurch and Rainham Village are the four that account for most of the enquiries we take.
Any external alteration visible from a public space typically requires full planning permission inside a conservation area: roof additions, dormers, replacement windows, rendering, hardstanding, and demolition. Internal works generally do not, unless the property is also listed.
Yes, and there is no way round it. The statement has to name what the character of the area actually consists of — in Rainham Village a medieval church and a working village street, in Upminster something largely interwar — and then say what your proposal does to it. Havering's designations are small and tightly drawn, so a statement written about the borough in general will not do the work. Ours goes together after the site visit, against the appraisal covering your particular area.
Dormers and rear mansards read differently out here than in inner London, because the stock is different. Havering holds 108,670 dwellings; 31.9% of them are 1930s work and roughly 28% more were finished in the two decades after the war, so the roofs in question are mostly suburban semis rather than terraces. A rear dormer that stays behind the ridge and out of public view is the standard answer. A front dormer on a principal slope inside a designated area is refused almost without exception.
Householder cases in Havering run against an 8-week statutory determination period, and 1,969 of the 2,012 measured came in on time: 97.9%. Read that beside a second figure, though. Some 1,206 of the borough's 3,218 householder decisions, better than a third of them, sat outside the clock under an agreed extension and never entered the 97.9%. Conservation-area cases are prime candidates for exactly that agreement, because the conservation officer's response adds two to three weeks by itself. Eleven to fourteen weeks after validation is the honest expectation.



Pick a slot that suits you. No obligation and no sales pressure, just straight answers on your planning route.
Which Havering districts we draw in, when their housing was built, and which council desk an application from each will land on. A note on the fee column: those are statutory England rates for 2026 and bear no relation to what the drawings themselves cost.
| Postcode | Area | Dominant stock | What it means for a conservation area application |
|---|---|---|---|
| RM4 | Havering-atte-Bower | Interwar semi-detached housing dominates Hornchurch and Upminster; Harold Hill and much of Romford are post-war; the older core of Romford keeps its Victorian streets. | RM4 is not Havering-only; it extends into Epping Forest and Brentwood. Conservation areas belong to the authority that designated them, so an area in the Epping Forest part of RM4 is Epping Forest’s designation and Epping Forest’s decision, not Havering’s. |
| RM5 | Collier Row | 1930s semi-detached | Collier Row occupies RM5 on its own, and Havering case officers apply the RM5 designation map to whatever is submitted from it. |
| RM7 | Romford / Rush Green | Victorian terraces, 1930s semi-detached, post-war flats | Romford and Rush Green share RM7; Havering validates every application from the district and reads it against the RM7 map. |
| RM11 | Hornchurch / Emerson Park | 1930s semi-detached | Hornchurch / Emerson Park sits wholly inside RM11, so Havering Council validates every conservation area application submitted from an RM11 address. |
| RM12 | Hornchurch / Elm Park | 1930s semi-detached | RM12 is Hornchurch and Elm Park, wholly within Havering, so the borough's own Local Plan policies decide the application. |
| RM13 | Rainham / Wennington | 1930s semi-detached | Rainham and Wennington make up RM13, handled by Havering, and the Rainham Village designation is the one most schemes there run into. |
| RM14 | Upminster / Cranham | 1930s semi-detached, Edwardian villas | RM14 covers Upminster and Cranham, again entirely Havering's, with no boundary question to settle before anything is drawn. |
| RM1 | Romford Central | Victorian terraces, 1930s semi-detached, post-war flats | RM1 is central Romford, all of it Havering's, and the Romford Market designation boundary runs through the district. |
Havering is 42.9% built-up land where London averages 66.0%, so plots here tend to run deeper and the roofs vary more. Both of those things change what a conservation-area scheme can reach at a given address.
Conservation areas in Havering: fifteen of them, and Rainham Village, Romford Market and Upminster are the ones owners here run into most. Designation takes away the permitted-development route, so what would have been a £249 prior approval settled in 6 weeks becomes a £548 householder application settled in 8. In Rainham Village the street elevation is the thing judged first, and the drawings ought to be prepared in the knowledge of that.
Havering permitted development status: there is no borough-wide direction from Havering Council, so a conservation area application at a RM1 address is normally still permitted development. We certify that with a £274 Lawful Development Certificate rather than leaving a Havering sale to argue it later.
What Havering is built from: 1930s semi-detached dominates Hornchurch and Upminster; post-war in Harold Hill and Romford; Victorian in older Romford centre. Outer east London; Metropolitan Green Belt covers north of the borough; permissive residential planning; strong PD use. That mix decides the conservation area application route in Havering more than the postcode does.
Sources for this Havering conservation area application page: borough policies maps and conservation-area registers (2025–26), Royal Mail postcode district boundaries, the Town and Country Planning (Fees for Applications) (England) Regulations, the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 as amended, and the Party Wall etc. Act 1996.

Same-day fixed quote. MCIAT chartered. 98% first-time approval rate.
Start free quoteOr contact us about your project first