The 45-degree rule is a daylight test used in most local plans: a line drawn at 45 degrees from the midpoint of a neighbour's nearest habitable-room window should not be crossed by your extension, in both plan and elevation. It is local guidance, not national law — but it decides a large share of householder refusals.
Last checked against current guidance on 2026-08-09. Rules differ by borough — the local pages below say how.
No. It appears in no Act, no regulation and not in the permitted development order. It is a daylight test councils publish in their own supplementary planning documents, and each borough draws it slightly differently — which is why the same extension passes in one borough and fails next door.
| Test | Where it comes from | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 45-degree rule | borough supplementary planning documents | policy guidance, not law |
| 25-degree rule for the vertical section | borough SPDs, drawn from BRE practice | policy guidance |
| Vertical sky component, 27% | BRE BR 209, 3rd edition (2022) | advisory good practice |
| Annual probable sunlight hours, 25% and 5% | BRE BR 209 | advisory good practice |
| Permitted development depth, 3m or 6m | GPDO 2015, Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A | law |
| Right of light, 20 years | Prescription Act 1832 | law |
Sources: BRE BR 209, Site Layout Planning for Daylight and Sunlight, 3rd edition (2022); the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015; the Prescription Act 1832. Read at 1 September 2026. Because the 45-degree test is local policy, the only reliable source for the version that applies to your site is the council’s own adopted design guidance.
It derives from BRE daylight guidance and is adopted, with local variations, in borough supplementary planning documents — it is not in the GPDO or the Planning Acts.
Because it is local guidance, the detail differs: some boroughs apply 45 degrees in plan and 25 degrees in section, some use both at 45, some measure from the window's midpoint and some from its nearest edge. Read your own borough's householder SPD before you design to a number you read online.
What does not differ is the underlying concern: whether your extension takes a neighbour's daylight, outlook or sense of enclosure to an unacceptable degree.
From the midpoint of the neighbour's nearest habitable-room window, a line is drawn at 45 degrees away from the shared boundary. If the extension's footprint crosses it, the scheme is flagged.
The same test is applied vertically from the same window: a 45-degree line rising from the window head or midpoint, depending on the borough, should clear the extension's roofline.
A single-storey rear extension frequently passes in plan and fails in elevation because of the roof pitch — which is why the fix is often a change of roof form rather than a change of depth.
Habitable rooms — living rooms, dining rooms and bedrooms. Kitchens, bathrooms, hallways and utility rooms are usually excluded.
The classification is worth checking before you concede a point. A neighbour objecting about a kitchen window is objecting about a window most boroughs do not protect under this test — though the officer will still weigh general amenity.
Conversely, an unnoticed rear bedroom window on the flank wall can fail a scheme that looked fine from the garden.


Demonstrating compliance is a drawing exercise: accurate elevations, the neighbour's window positions surveyed rather than estimated, and the line shown on the drawing rather than asserted in the covering letter. The estimator below scopes that package from your project type and floor area.
Move the controls for an indicative figure. It anchors your budget — it is not a quote. Every project is priced after a free survey.
Build costs are separate and quoted by your contractor. See our published fees.

Crossing it is a material consideration, not an automatic refusal — but you need a reason the officer can write down.
What does not work is asserting compliance without drawing it. Officers check.
Not directly — permitted development is tested against the GPDO conditions, not local daylight guidance.
There is one important exception. Under the prior approval route for a larger home extension, the council determines the application on the impact on the amenity of adjoining premises, and boroughs routinely reach for their 45-degree guidance to make that judgement.
So a 6m rear extension by prior approval can be refused on exactly the test that would not apply to a 3m one.
No. It is guidance adopted in local plans and supplementary planning documents, derived from BRE daylight research. Its detail varies by borough.
Yes, and it is far more likely to bite. The elevation test is what usually decides a two-storey rear extension near a boundary.
An objection is not a veto. The officer weighs it against policy. A well-evidenced daylight objection carries weight; a general objection to change does not.
Most boroughs apply the test only to habitable rooms, but general amenity impact is still assessed. Check your borough's own wording.
For most householder schemes, accurate elevations showing the line are enough. Formal BRE assessments are usually reserved for larger or contested schemes.

The 45-degree test is not in any Act. It is a daylight rule of thumb that boroughs adopted into their Local Plan policies and design SPDs, drawing on building research guidance. That is why the detail differs across London — check your own borough's document before you draw anything: