Covering London & the South East (Surrey, Kent) 020 8068 6981 [email protected] WhatsApp
Section 73A · Built without consent

How to apply for retrospective planning permission

You apply the same way as for any householder scheme: drawings of what was actually built, the form and the £548 fee, submitted through the Planning Portal. Section 73A lets the council grant permission for work already done. The risk is that a refusal leaves you facing enforcement, so the drawings must be accurate first time.

Checked against legislation.gov.uk, GOV.UK planning guidance and MHCLG statistics on 12 September 2026. Applies to England.

What does section 73A actually allow?

It lets a council grant planning permission for development carried out before the application was made, and lets that permission take effect from the date the work was done.

Section 73A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 covers three situations: work carried out with no permission at all, work that outlived a temporary permission, and work that ignored a condition attached to a permission you did have. It is the route for anything that went past permitted development: a single-storey rear extension deeper than 3 metres on a terraced or semi-detached house, for example, or works in an area where an Article 4 direction removed the rights. A rear extension built with clear glazing where the permission required obscure glass, or a flat roof used as a terrace where a condition forbade it, is a breach just as much as a building nobody applied for.

A retrospective application is judged against the same Local Plan policies as any other. Government guidance is explicit that it must be considered in the normal way, on its planning merits, even where the council invited it. For the plain definition and how the term is used, see our glossary entry on retrospective planning. This guide is about doing it.

How do you apply, step by step?

Survey what is there, draw it exactly as built, then submit a householder application with the ordinary fee.

  1. Measure the building as it stands. The drawings must show what exists, not what the builder was told to build. Officers compare them with photographs and, often, a site visit. A small error in height at the boundary undermines everything else in the submission.
  2. Draw existing and proposed. For retrospective work, "existing" is usually the house before the works and "proposed" is the house as it now stands. Include a location plan, block plan, floor plans, elevations and, where height at the boundary matters, a section.
  3. Decide whether to offer changes. If part of the work is plainly unacceptable, such as a raised terrace overlooking a neighbour's garden, show it removed or screened on the drawings. Permission for a reduced scheme is better than refusal of the whole.
  4. Tick the retrospective box. The application form asks whether the work has already started and, if so, when. Answer truthfully. The date matters for the time limits below.
  5. Pay the fee and wait for validation. Councils aim to decide householder applications within eight weeks.
ItemFigureWhat it means for you
Householder application fee, one house£548The same fee as a prospective application (from 1 April 2026)
Lawful Development Certificate, proposed works£274Half the full fee. A certificate for existing work is a different application with its own fee
Householder decisions in England, year to March 2026151,90051% of all planning decisions
Householder applications granted90%Across all householder decisions, not retrospective ones alone
Decided within 8 weeks or agreed time93%The usual decision window

Sources: MHCLG, Planning fees: annual indexation from 1 April 2026; MHCLG, Planning applications in England: January to March 2026. Both retrieved 12 September 2026.

The 90% grant rate is a national figure for all householder applications. MHCLG does not publish a separate rate for retrospective ones, so treat it as the ceiling, not your odds.

How long does the council have to take action?

In England, ten years for building work substantially completed on or after 25 April 2024. Work completed before that date keeps the old four-year limit.

The Levelling-up and Regeneration Act 2023 changed section 171B of the 1990 Act. Before the change, building operations became immune from enforcement four years after substantial completion. Now the period is ten years for everything in England. The transitional rule in regulation 5 of SI 2024/452 keeps the four-year limit for operations substantially completed, and changes of use to a single house that happened, before 25 April 2024.

BreachBefore 25 April 2024On or after 25 April 2024
Building work (extensions, dormers, outbuildings)4 years from substantial completion10 years from substantial completion
Change of use to a single dwelling4 years from the breach10 years from the breach
Any other breach, including breach of condition10 years10 years
Deliberately concealed workThe limit can be overridden: the council can apply to a magistrates' court for a planning enforcement order within 6 months of having enough evidence

Sources: Town and Country Planning Act 1990, s.171B; SI 2024/452, regulation 5; GOV.UK, Enforcement and post-permission matters. Retrieved 12 September 2026.

If your work is already past its limit, a retrospective application is the wrong tool. A Lawful Development Certificate for an existing development asks the council to confirm the work is immune. It turns on dated evidence: invoices, building control completion certificates, dated photographs, council tax records.

What are the risks of applying?

You get one chance to obtain permission after the event, and a refusal tells the council exactly what is there.

  • The one-chance rule. Government guidance says a person who has carried out unauthorised development has only one opportunity to get permission afterwards: either a section 73A application or a ground (a) appeal against an enforcement notice, not both.
  • Lost ground (a). Under section 174(2A), if the council issues an enforcement notice after your related application, you cannot argue on appeal that permission ought to be granted, unless the notice comes more than two years after the application stopped being under consideration.
  • The council can decline to decide. Section 70C lets it refuse to determine a retrospective application if an enforcement notice covering the same work was issued first.
  • Community Infrastructure Levy. In a CIL charging area, retrospective permission is not eligible for reliefs or exemptions other than the minor development exemption.
  • Selling the house. A buyer's solicitor will ask for the permission. A refusal on the public register is harder to explain than an application never made, so apply with a scheme that can win.

What happens if it is refused?

You can appeal. For a householder refusal the Planning Inspectorate must receive the appeal within 12 weeks of the decision date, cut to 28 days where an enforcement notice on the same development was served within the two years before your application. Appeals on applications made on or after 1 April 2026 follow the written "part 1" procedure: no new evidence, so the drawings you submitted are the drawings the inspector judges. Our planning appeal service sets out the fees and published timings.

The council may instead, or as well, serve an enforcement notice. That starts its own clock, explained in our guide to receiving a planning enforcement notice.

When should you apply rather than wait?

Apply once a neighbour has complained, the council has written to you, or you are about to sell. A planning contravention notice has to be answered within 21 days, and failing to reply is itself an offence under section 171D. An enforcement warning notice under section 172ZA, introduced on 25 April 2024, is the council formally inviting an application by a set date. There is no appeal against it, and it counts as enforcement action for the time limits.

Waiting in the hope of reaching immunity means ten years for anything finished since 25 April 2024, and every one of those years is a sale or remortgage where the question can come up.

Written by Benyamen Shaukat, Technical Architect & Platform Founder. Fact-checked against the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (ss.70C, 73A, 171B, 172ZA, 174, 179) on 12 September 2026.

Common questions

Does a retrospective application cost more than a normal one?

No. A section 73A application is an application for planning permission and pays the ordinary fee: £548 for a householder scheme on a single house in England from 1 April 2026.

Can I keep using the extension while the application is decided?

Making an application does not suspend the council's enforcement powers, so whether it waits for the decision is the council's call. Using what is built is lower risk than carrying on with unfinished unauthorised work, which a temporary stop notice can halt immediately.

Is it a crime to build without planning permission?

The offence in section 179 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 is failing to comply with an enforcement notice once the compliance period has ended. A conviction carries an unlimited fine.

What if my work was finished more than four years ago?

If building work was substantially completed before 25 April 2024, the old four-year limit still applies. Evidence of that date can support a Lawful Development Certificate instead of a retrospective application.

Can I appeal if the retrospective application is refused?

Yes. A householder refusal can be appealed to the Planning Inspectorate within 12 weeks of the decision date, or 28 days if an enforcement notice was served first.

Where to go next

The law a retrospective application sits under

Every rule on this page comes from primary legislation or government guidance, read on 12 September 2026. Your borough's Local Plan decides whether the work itself is acceptable:

Found this useful? Share it

Copies the headline and the link, ready to paste anywhere — helpful if you are planning an extension with a neighbour, builder or architect.